OK, we'll do so...
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Daniel P. Berrange
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 10:55:31PM +0200, Ruben S. Montero wrote:
>> Hi Daniel
>>
>> These are great news indeed!. We are already doing the testing of the driver.
>>
>> THANK YOU VERY MUCH for your help
>
> It would
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 10:55:31PM +0200, Ruben S. Montero wrote:
> Hi Daniel
>
> These are great news indeed!. We are already doing the testing of the driver.
>
> THANK YOU VERY MUCH for your help
It would be good to get a page on the libvirt website outlining how
to use the OpenNebula driver.
Hi Daniel
These are great news indeed!. We are already doing the testing of the driver.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH for your help
Ruben
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 12:14:44PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 06:42:37PM +
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 12:14:44PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 06:42:37PM +0200, Javier Fontan wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > The first patch makes OpenNebula driver compilable in recent codebase.
> > The second one adds direct calls to xmlrpc library so it does not
> > d
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 06:42:37PM +0200, Javier Fontan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The first patch makes OpenNebula driver compilable in recent codebase.
> The second one adds direct calls to xmlrpc library so it does not
> depend on OpenNebula libraries and can be licensed as LGPL.
This looks good. I'l
Hello,
The first patch makes OpenNebula driver compilable in recent codebase.
The second one adds direct calls to xmlrpc library so it does not
depend on OpenNebula libraries and can be licensed as LGPL.
I have compiled libvirt with the modifications without errors but with
the current version I
