On 04/18/2013 01:36 AM, Tal Kain wrote:
>>
>> Personally, I don't think the patch is too bad, and I'll probably apply
>> it unless Dan can give a stronger objection.
>>
> I was wondering if there are any updates about this patch
Sure, I just applied it. I shortened the subject line (generally com
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 1:04 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 04/09/2013 12:38 AM, Tal Kain wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Daniel P. Berrange >wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 03:33:07PM +0300, Tal Kain wrote:
> >>> Signed-off-by: Tal Kain
> >>> ---
> >>> src/qemu/qemu_capabilitie
On 04/09/2013 12:38 AM, Tal Kain wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 03:33:07PM +0300, Tal Kain wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Tal Kain
>>> ---
>>> src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c | 13 +++--
>>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 del
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 03:33:07PM +0300, Tal Kain wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Tal Kain
> > ---
> > src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c | 13 +++--
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> What is the motivation for doin
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 03:33:07PM +0300, Tal Kain wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Tal Kain
> ---
> src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c | 13 +++--
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
What is the motivation for doing this ? it just looks like
overkill to me, since virArchFromHost isn't
Signed-off-by: Tal Kain
---
src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c | 13 +++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c b/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c
index 50712b0..b235059 100644
--- a/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c
+++ b/src/qemu/qemu_capabilitie
