On 05/03/2013 02:58 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 03:58:23PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
>> POSIX says pthread_t is opaque. We can't guarantee if it is scaler
>> or a pointer, nor what size it is; and BSD differs from Linux.
>> We've also had reports of gcc complaining on at
On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 03:58:23PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> POSIX says pthread_t is opaque. We can't guarantee if it is scaler
> or a pointer, nor what size it is; and BSD differs from Linux.
> We've also had reports of gcc complaining on attempts to cast it,
> if we use a cast to the wrong type
Hi Eric,
On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 03:58:23PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> POSIX says pthread_t is opaque. We can't guarantee if it is scaler
> or a pointer, nor what size it is; and BSD differs from Linux.
> We've also had reports of gcc complaining on attempts to cast it,
> if we use a cast to the w
POSIX says pthread_t is opaque. We can't guarantee if it is scaler
or a pointer, nor what size it is; and BSD differs from Linux.
We've also had reports of gcc complaining on attempts to cast it,
if we use a cast to the wrong type (for example, pointers have to be
cast to void* or intptr_t before
