On 06/15/2012 10:24 AM, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> Commit 6e769eba made it a runtime error if libvirt was compiled
>> without yajl support but targets a new enough qemu. But enough
>> users are hitting this on self-compiled libvirt that it is wo
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> Commit 6e769eba made it a runtime error if libvirt was compiled
> without yajl support but targets a new enough qemu. But enough
> users are hitting this on self-compiled libvirt that it is worth
> erroring out at compilation time, rather than
On 06/13/2012 11:00 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> Commit 6e769eba made it a runtime error if libvirt was compiled
> without yajl support but targets a new enough qemu. But enough
> users are hitting this on self-compiled libvirt that it is worth
> erroring out at compilation time, rather than an obscure
Commit 6e769eba made it a runtime error if libvirt was compiled
without yajl support but targets a new enough qemu. But enough
users are hitting this on self-compiled libvirt that it is worth
erroring out at compilation time, rather than an obscure failure
when trying to use the built executable.