Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] build: hoist qemu dependence on yajl to configure

2012-06-15 Thread Eric Blake
On 06/15/2012 10:24 AM, Doug Goldstein wrote: > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Eric Blake wrote: >> Commit 6e769eba made it a runtime error if libvirt was compiled >> without yajl support but targets a new enough qemu. But enough >> users are hitting this on self-compiled libvirt that it is wo

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] build: hoist qemu dependence on yajl to configure

2012-06-15 Thread Doug Goldstein
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > Commit 6e769eba made it a runtime error if libvirt was compiled > without yajl support but targets a new enough qemu.  But enough > users are hitting this on self-compiled libvirt that it is worth > erroring out at compilation time, rather than

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] build: hoist qemu dependence on yajl to configure

2012-06-13 Thread Eric Blake
On 06/13/2012 11:00 AM, Eric Blake wrote: > Commit 6e769eba made it a runtime error if libvirt was compiled > without yajl support but targets a new enough qemu. But enough > users are hitting this on self-compiled libvirt that it is worth > erroring out at compilation time, rather than an obscure

[libvirt] [PATCH] build: hoist qemu dependence on yajl to configure

2012-06-13 Thread Eric Blake
Commit 6e769eba made it a runtime error if libvirt was compiled without yajl support but targets a new enough qemu. But enough users are hitting this on self-compiled libvirt that it is worth erroring out at compilation time, rather than an obscure failure when trying to use the built executable.