On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 12:09:02PM +0100, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 15:22:13 -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
> > On 02/17/2011 08:06 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> > > I haven't tried that but xsltproc should support -o directory/
> >
> > My recollection was that it didn't quite work:
>
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 15:22:13 -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 02/17/2011 08:06 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> > I haven't tried that but xsltproc should support -o directory/
>
> My recollection was that it didn't quite work:
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2010-June/msg00675.html
Quot
On 02/17/2011 08:06 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 16:19:38 -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
>> Anything distributed in the tarball should be built into srcdir.
>>
>> * docs/Makefile.am (%.html): Build into srcdir.
>> ---
>>
>> This gets a VPATH build further, but things still aren't co
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 16:19:38 -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
> Anything distributed in the tarball should be built into srcdir.
>
> * docs/Makefile.am (%.html): Build into srcdir.
> ---
>
> This gets a VPATH build further, but things still aren't complete for
> doing 'make install' from a brand-new
Anything distributed in the tarball should be built into srcdir.
* docs/Makefile.am (%.html): Build into srcdir.
---
This gets a VPATH build further, but things still aren't complete for
doing 'make install' from a brand-new clone (or from autobuild.sh). I
don't know how to make xsltproc output
