On 12/02/2011 02:21 PM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
+
+/* We need to re-check if the buck has been passed to this thread
+ * as this thread might have been signalled to wake up, but the another
Just remove "the" from "but the another".
+ * call might acquire the lock before t
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 14:06:06 +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
> Originaly, the code checked if another client is the queue and infered
> ownership of the buck from that. Commit fa9595003d043df9f2efe95521c008
> added a separate variable to track the buck. That caused, that a new
> call might enter cla
Originaly, the code checked if another client is the queue and infered
ownership of the buck from that. Commit fa9595003d043df9f2efe95521c008
added a separate variable to track the buck. That caused, that a new
call might enter claiming it has the buck, while another thread was
signalled to take th
