On 04/11/2013 12:05 AM, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/10/2013 05:51 AM, Guannan Ren wrote:
==5306== 8 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 24 of 277
==5306==at 0x4C28B2F: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:593)
==5306==by 0x5293CAF: virAllocN (viralloc.c:152)
==5306==by 0
On 04/10/2013 05:51 AM, Guannan Ren wrote:
> ==5306== 8 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 24 of 277
> ==5306==at 0x4C28B2F: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:593)
> ==5306==by 0x5293CAF: virAllocN (viralloc.c:152)
> ==5306==by 0x52DFEAE: virXPathNodeSet (virxml.c:611)
>
==5306== 8 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 24 of 277
==5306==at 0x4C28B2F: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:593)
==5306==by 0x5293CAF: virAllocN (viralloc.c:152)
==5306==by 0x52DFEAE: virXPathNodeSet (virxml.c:611)
==5306==by 0x5313DD9: virNetworkDefParseXML (ne