On 10/26/2012 07:59 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On 10/25/12 22:57, Eric Blake wrote:
>> It turns out that the cpuacct results properly account for offline
>> cpus, and always returns results for every possible cpu, not just
>> the online ones. So there is no need to check the map of online
>> cpus i
On 10/25/12 22:57, Eric Blake wrote:
It turns out that the cpuacct results properly account for offline
cpus, and always returns results for every possible cpu, not just
the online ones. So there is no need to check the map of online
cpus in the first place, merely only a need to know the maximu
It turns out that the cpuacct results properly account for offline
cpus, and always returns results for every possible cpu, not just
the online ones. So there is no need to check the map of online
cpus in the first place, merely only a need to know the maximum
possible cpu. Meanwhile, virNodeGetC
