Hi,
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 09:12:03AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 08:30:19PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> >On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 09:58:12AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> >[..snip..]
> >>No message like that for me. I completes with 2 test failures (namely
> >>
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 08:30:19PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 09:58:12AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
[..snip..]
No message like that for me. I completes with 2 test failures (namely
qemuxml2argvtest and virsh-uriprecedence), but no problem with any
That's caused b
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 09:58:12AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
[..snip..]
> No message like that for me. I completes with 2 test failures (namely
> qemuxml2argvtest and virsh-uriprecedence), but no problem with any
That's caused by:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=78123
On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 09:27:00AM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 03:27:05PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
[..snip..]
Guido, I think the original problem you're seeing is just an ordering
problem. If you revert you patch, and apply this one:
This gives the same error. Fe
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 03:27:05PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
[..snip..]
> Guido, I think the original problem you're seeing is just an ordering
> problem. If you revert you patch, and apply this one:
This gives the same error. Feel free to revert my change and I keep
the patch in Debian unti
On 31.08.2015 18:11, Guido Günther wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 05:22:23PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:50:54AM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 03:12:36AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 19.08.2015 14:40, Guido Günther wrote:
>
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 05:22:23PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:50:54AM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> >On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 03:12:36AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> >>On 19.08.2015 14:40, Guido Günther wrote:
> >>> We're using the %.html.tmp for all html files
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:50:54AM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 03:12:36AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 19.08.2015 14:40, Guido Günther wrote:
> We're using the %.html.tmp for all html files now so drop the unused one
> and rather make sure the needed directory exists
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 03:12:36AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 19.08.2015 14:40, Guido Günther wrote:
> > We're using the %.html.tmp for all html files now so drop the unused one
> > and rather make sure the needed directory exists.
> >
> > This fixes build failures as described in
> >
>
On 19.08.2015 14:40, Guido Günther wrote:
> We're using the %.html.tmp for all html files now so drop the unused one
> and rather make sure the needed directory exists.
>
> This fixes build failures as described in
>
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2015-August/msg00603.html
> --
We're using the %.html.tmp for all html files now so drop the unused one
and rather make sure the needed directory exists.
This fixes build failures as described in
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2015-August/msg00603.html
---
configure.ac | 1 +
docs/Makefile.am | 9
11 matches
Mail list logo
