On 20/01/2011, at 9:58 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> I think perhaps the two pages should be re-arranged, it doesn't
> entirely make sense to have two different pages of related links
> at the same level in the nav. Either just have one page with
> all the data, or split up the apps page into a
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 03:05:52PM +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 05:19:53PM +1100, Justin Clift wrote:
> > ---
> > docs/sitemap.html.in | 10 --
> > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/docs/sitemap.html.in b/docs/sitemap.html.i
On 20/01/2011, at 6:05 PM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 05:19:53PM +1100, Justin Clift wrote:
>> ---
>> docs/sitemap.html.in | 10 --
>> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> Hum, it makes "Related Links" rather empty, but okay
Thanks Daniel, pushed. :)
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 05:19:53PM +1100, Justin Clift wrote:
> ---
> docs/sitemap.html.in | 10 --
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/docs/sitemap.html.in b/docs/sitemap.html.in
> index 7077038..bcce62f 100644
> --- a/docs/sitemap.html.in
> +++ b/docs/s
---
docs/sitemap.html.in | 10 --
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/docs/sitemap.html.in b/docs/sitemap.html.in
index 7077038..bcce62f 100644
--- a/docs/sitemap.html.in
+++ b/docs/sitemap.html.in
@@ -19,6 +19,10 @@
+Applicati
