Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] maint: use gnulib configmake rather than open-coding things

2010-11-17 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:19:22AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote: > On 11/17/2010 07:32 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:53:03AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote: > >> In some cases, we were just plain confusing (BINDIR expanded to > >> $(libexecdir), GETTEXT_PACKAGE redefined PACKAGE

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] maint: use gnulib configmake rather than open-coding things

2010-11-17 Thread Eric Blake
On 11/17/2010 07:32 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:53:03AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote: >> In some cases, we were just plain confusing (BINDIR expanded to >> $(libexecdir), GETTEXT_PACKAGE redefined PACKAGE for no apparant >> reason); in other cases, we might as well benefit

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] maint: use gnulib configmake rather than open-coding things

2010-11-17 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:53:03AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote: > In some cases, we were just plain confusing (BINDIR expanded to > $(libexecdir), GETTEXT_PACKAGE redefined PACKAGE for no apparant > reason); in other cases, we might as well benefit from gnulib doing > the work for us (PKGDATADIR), some

[libvirt] [PATCH] maint: use gnulib configmake rather than open-coding things

2010-11-16 Thread Eric Blake
In some cases, we were just plain confusing (BINDIR expanded to $(libexecdir), GETTEXT_PACKAGE redefined PACKAGE for no apparant reason); in other cases, we might as well benefit from gnulib doing the work for us (PKGDATADIR), sometimes with different spellings (LOCAL_STATE_DIR vs. LOCALSTATEDIR).