On 10/18/2012 10:44 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> which frees all allocated memory but doesn't set the passed pointer to
> NULL. Therefore, we must do it ourselves. This is causing actual
> libvirtd crash: Basically, when doing 'virsh net-edit' the newDef should
> be dropped.
Well, when you're d
On 18.10.2012 17:02, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 16:44:24 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>> which frees all allocated memory but doesn't set the passed pointer to
>> NULL. Therefore, we must do it ourselves. This is causing actual
>> libvirtd crash: Basically, when doing 'virsh
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 16:44:24 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> which frees all allocated memory but doesn't set the passed pointer to
> NULL. Therefore, we must do it ourselves. This is causing actual
> libvirtd crash: Basically, when doing 'virsh net-edit' the newDef should
> be dropped. And
which frees all allocated memory but doesn't set the passed pointer to
NULL. Therefore, we must do it ourselves. This is causing actual
libvirtd crash: Basically, when doing 'virsh net-edit' the newDef should
be dropped. And the memory is freed, indeed. However, the pointer is
not set to NULL but