Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] private.syms: Drop virKillProcess

2012-10-05 Thread Michal Privoznik
On 05.10.2012 14:23, Eric Blake wrote: > On 10/05/2012 05:36 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote: >> After it got renamed to virProcessKill (cf470068a11) >> it is no longer needed in the private syms file. >> --- >> >> It is trivial, but maybe worth inventing cfg.mk macro >> that does check if all symbols f

[libvirt] [PATCH] private.syms: Drop virKillProcess

2012-10-05 Thread Michal Privoznik
After it got renamed to virProcessKill (cf470068a11) it is no longer needed in the private syms file. --- It is trivial, but maybe worth inventing cfg.mk macro that does check if all symbols fro private syms are defined somewhere. However, I am not that familiar with cfg.mk, so if anybody has any

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] private.syms: Drop virKillProcess

2012-10-05 Thread Eric Blake
On 10/05/2012 05:36 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote: > After it got renamed to virProcessKill (cf470068a11) > it is no longer needed in the private syms file. > --- > > It is trivial, but maybe worth inventing cfg.mk macro > that does check if all symbols fro private syms are > defined somewhere. Howev