On 03/28/2011 08:29 PM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 03:19:30PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
>> First fallout of fd: migration - it looks like SELinux enforcing
>> _does_ require fd labeling (running uninstalled libvirtd from an
>> unconstrained shell had no problems, but once faked
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 03:19:30PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> First fallout of fd: migration - it looks like SELinux enforcing
> _does_ require fd labeling (running uninstalled libvirtd from an
> unconstrained shell had no problems, but once faked out by doing
> chcon `stat -c %C /usr/sbin/libvirt
First fallout of fd: migration - it looks like SELinux enforcing
_does_ require fd labeling (running uninstalled libvirtd from an
unconstrained shell had no problems, but once faked out by doing
chcon `stat -c %C /usr/sbin/libvirtd` daemon/libvirtd
run_init $PWD/daemon/libvirtd
to run it with the