On 04/26/2012 02:17 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 04/26/2012 02:11 PM, Stefan Berger wrote:
>> On 04/26/2012 03:50 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>>
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816662 pointed out
>>> that attempting 'virsh blockpull' on an offline domain gave a
>>> misleading error message
On 04/26/2012 02:11 PM, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 04/26/2012 03:50 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816662 pointed out
>> that attempting 'virsh blockpull' on an offline domain gave a
>> misleading error message about qemu lacking support for the
>> operation,
On 04/26/2012 03:50 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816662 pointed out
that attempting 'virsh blockpull' on an offline domain gave a
misleading error message about qemu lacking support for the
operation, even when qemu was specifically updated to support it.
The
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816662 pointed out
that attempting 'virsh blockpull' on an offline domain gave a
misleading error message about qemu lacking support for the
operation, even when qemu was specifically updated to support it.
The real problem is that we have several capabil
