On 07/27/2016 03:31 PM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
On Tue, 2016-07-26 at 18:41 +0200, Ján Tomko wrote:
[cc-ing Andrea who auto-added panic for PPC64]
Should we do the same for PANIC_MODEL_PSERIES?
Thanks for the heads-up.
If we care about migrating guests to <= 1.2.16, then we
should indeed to
On Tue, 2016-07-26 at 18:41 +0200, Ján Tomko wrote:
> [cc-ing Andrea who auto-added panic for PPC64]
>
> Should we do the same for PANIC_MODEL_PSERIES?
Thanks for the heads-up.
If we care about migrating guests to <= 1.2.16, then we
should indeed to the same for pSeries guests.
I don't see how
[cc-ing Andrea who auto-added panic for PPC64]
Should we do the same for PANIC_MODEL_PSERIES?
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 09:52:59AM +0200, Boris Fiuczynski wrote:
The panic device with model s390 is autogenerated on domains with
S390 architecture since libvirt version 1.3.5.
For backwards compatib
The panic device with model s390 is autogenerated on domains with
S390 architecture since libvirt version 1.3.5.
For backwards compatibility reasons the device is to be removed
when migrating.
Signed-off-by: Boris Fiuczynski
---
src/qemu/qemu_domain.c | 22 ++
1 file changed,