Ján Tomko wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 08:53:08PM +0300, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
> > Ján Tomko wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:47:04AM +0300, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
> > > > Currently, qemuxml2argvmock.c only mocks virNumaNodeIsAvailable(), and
> > > > only if libvirt was bu
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 08:53:08PM +0300, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
> Ján Tomko wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:47:04AM +0300, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
> > > Currently, qemuxml2argvmock.c only mocks virNumaNodeIsAvailable(), and
> > > only if libvirt was built with NUMA support. This caus
Ján Tomko wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:47:04AM +0300, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
> > Currently, qemuxml2argvmock.c only mocks virNumaNodeIsAvailable(), and
> > only if libvirt was built with NUMA support. This causes some test
> > failures where NUMA is involved.
> >
>
> This is misleadin
On Fri, 2016-05-13 at 14:07 +0200, Ján Tomko wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:47:04AM +0300, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
> >
> > Currently, qemuxml2argvmock.c only mocks virNumaNodeIsAvailable(), and
> > only if libvirt was built with NUMA support. This causes some test
> > failures where NUMA is
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:47:04AM +0300, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
> Currently, qemuxml2argvmock.c only mocks virNumaNodeIsAvailable(), and
> only if libvirt was built with NUMA support. This causes some test
> failures where NUMA is involved.
>
This is misleading, you are probably compiling with
Currently, qemuxml2argvmock.c only mocks virNumaNodeIsAvailable(), and
only if libvirt was built with NUMA support. This causes some test
failures where NUMA is involved.
For example, memory-hotplug-dimm fails because it goes all they way down
to qemuBuildMemoryBackendStr() that calls virNumaNodes
