On 05/27/2011 08:39 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 01:25:24PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 05/26/2011 12:58 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 02:10:24PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
Since directories can be used for passthrough, they are
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 01:25:24PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 05/26/2011 12:58 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 02:10:24PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
> >> Since directories can be used for passthrough, they are
> >> basically storage volumes. Not sure if anyone has an
On 05/26/2011 12:58 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 02:10:24PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
>> Since directories can be used for passthrough, they are
>> basically storage volumes. Not sure if anyone has an opinion about
>> not listing directories like ., .., or lost+found,
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 02:10:24PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
> Since directories can be used for passthrough, they are
> basically storage volumes. Not sure if anyone has an opinion about
> not listing directories like ., .., or lost+found, but this patch
> doesn't do anything explicit with them
Since directories can be used for passthrough, they are
basically storage volumes. Not sure if anyone has an opinion about
not listing directories like ., .., or lost+found, but this patch
doesn't do anything explicit with them.
---
src/storage/storage_backend.c| 34
