On Fri, 2016-04-08 at 14:17 +0200, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > doesn't 'addr' need to be checked as well?
>
> 'addr' is declared as ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL. Also it wasn't touched by that
> patch so I don't thinkso.
Right, never mind then.
> > I'd like to have all of these fixed in a single patch, but
> >
On Fri, 2016-04-08 at 13:55 +0200, Peter Krempa wrote:
> VIR_SOCKET_ADDR_VALID dereferences the pointer, thus if we pass NULL
> into virNetDevSetIPAddress it crashes. Regression introduced by
> b3d069872ce53eb.
>
> Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325120
> ---
> src/util/vir
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 14:11:00 +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-04-08 at 13:55 +0200, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > VIR_SOCKET_ADDR_VALID dereferences the pointer, thus if we pass NULL
> > into virNetDevSetIPAddress it crashes. Regression introduced by
> > b3d069872ce53eb.
> >
> > Resolve
2016-04-08 14:55 GMT+03:00 Peter Krempa :
> VIR_SOCKET_ADDR_VALID dereferences the pointer, thus if we pass NULL
> into virNetDevSetIPAddress it crashes. Regression introduced by
> b3d069872ce53eb.
My fail, thanks!
--
Vasiliy Tolstov,
e-mail: v.tols...@selfip.ru
--
libvir-list mailing list
lib
VIR_SOCKET_ADDR_VALID dereferences the pointer, thus if we pass NULL
into virNetDevSetIPAddress it crashes. Regression introduced by
b3d069872ce53eb.
Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325120
---
src/util/virnetdev.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff
