On 6/21/19 9:43 PM, John Ferlan wrote:
> Coverity has been tripped up a few more times recently...
> The memory leak patch probably I what I noted from Jiri's recent
> CPU series. The return value check is older. It wasn't clear
> though if the intention of the module was to ignore errors
> so I j
Coverity has been tripped up a few more times recently...
The memory leak patch probably I what I noted from Jiri's recent
CPU series. The return value check is older. It wasn't clear
though if the intention of the module was to ignore errors
so I just chose to error out like other similar callers
