Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/5] [RFC] Add support for per-guest-node binding

2014-05-28 Thread Martin Kletzander
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:18:30AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:48:31AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: Caveats: - I'm not sure how cpu hotplug is done with guest numa nodes, but if there is a possibility to increase the number of numa nodes (which does not

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/5] [RFC] Add support for per-guest-node binding

2014-05-28 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:48:31AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: > Caveats: > > - I'm not sure how cpu hotplug is done with guest numa nodes, but if >there is a possibility to increase the number of numa nodes (which >does not make sense to me from (a) user point of view and (b) our >

[libvirt] [PATCH 0/5] [RFC] Add support for per-guest-node binding

2014-05-28 Thread Martin Kletzander
Currently we are only able to bind the whole domain to some host nodes using the /domain/numatune/memory element. Numerous requests were made to support host<->guest numa node bindings, so this series tries to pinch an idea on how to do that using /domain/numatune/memnode elements. So here are fe