On 03/03/2011 05:04 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
>> Sorry for the delays; it's been a busy week (I've been swamped trying to
>> debug libvirt crashes, which takes a higher priority on my plate over
>> libvirt feature additions). Don't give up yet; and it's fine to ping us
>> every few days if we c
On Thu, 03 Mar 2011 17:06:05 -0700
Eric Blake wrote:
> On 03/03/2011 04:40 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> > On Thu, 3 Mar 2011 10:07:40 +0900
> > KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Now, Xen supports at(de)tach-disk, at(de)tach-interface for inactive
> >> domains
> >> with --perisitent opti
On 03/03/2011 04:40 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Mar 2011 10:07:40 +0900
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
>
>>
>> Now, Xen supports at(de)tach-disk, at(de)tach-interface for inactive domains
>> with --perisitent option. (Using --persisten against live domain will
>> cause error.)
>>
>> Now,
On Thu, 3 Mar 2011 10:07:40 +0900
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
>
> Now, Xen supports at(de)tach-disk, at(de)tach-interface for inactive domains
> with --perisitent option. (Using --persisten against live domain will
> cause error.)
>
> Now, virsh attach-xxx/detach-xxx cannot modify inactive domains
Now, Xen supports at(de)tach-disk, at(de)tach-interface for inactive domains
with --perisitent option. (Using --persisten against live domain will
cause error.)
Now, virsh attach-xxx/detach-xxx cannot modify inactive domains in qemu and
--persistent option just returns error.
This series adds su
