On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:54:02 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 01:29:18AM +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> > In case a client is sending lots of stream calls (which are not supposed to
> > generate any reply), the assumption that having other calls in a queue is
> > suffic
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 01:29:18AM +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> So far, we were dropping non-blocking calls whenever sending them would block.
> In case a client is sending lots of stream calls (which are not supposed to
> generate any reply), the assumption that having other calls in a queue is
>
So far, we were dropping non-blocking calls whenever sending them would block.
In case a client is sending lots of stream calls (which are not supposed to
generate any reply), the assumption that having other calls in a queue is
sufficient to get a reply from the server doesn't work. I tried to fix
