Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 03/12] vcpu: add new public API

2010-10-01 Thread Eric Blake
On 10/01/2010 10:13 AM, Matthias Bolte wrote: However, in implementing things, I'm wondering if I should use the names: VIR_DOMAIN_VCPU_CONFIG (instead of VIR_DOMAIN_VCPU_PERSISTENT) VIR_DOMAIN_VCPU_LIVE (instead of VIR_DOMAIN_VCPU_ACTIVE) to match virDomainDeviceModifyFlags, where _CONFIG and

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 03/12] vcpu: add new public API

2010-10-01 Thread Matthias Bolte
2010/9/30 Eric Blake : > API agreed on in > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2010-September/msg00456.html > > * include/libvirt/libvirt.h.in (virDomainVcpuFlags) > (virDomainSetVcpusFlags, virDomainGetVcpusFlags): New > declarations. > * src/libvirt_public.syms: Export new symbols. > ---

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 03/12] vcpu: add new public API

2010-10-01 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 06:02:07PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > API agreed on in > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2010-September/msg00456.html > > * include/libvirt/libvirt.h.in (virDomainVcpuFlags) > (virDomainSetVcpusFlags, virDomainGetVcpusFlags): New > declarations. > * src/libvirt_

[libvirt] [PATCH 03/12] vcpu: add new public API

2010-09-29 Thread Eric Blake
API agreed on in https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2010-September/msg00456.html * include/libvirt/libvirt.h.in (virDomainVcpuFlags) (virDomainSetVcpusFlags, virDomainGetVcpusFlags): New declarations. * src/libvirt_public.syms: Export new symbols. --- However, in implementing things, I'm