Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 04/11] Separate virGetHostname() API contract from driver APIs

2013-05-03 Thread Ján Tomko
On 05/02/2013 02:03 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > From: "Daniel P. Berrange" > > Currently the virGetHostname() API has a bogus virConnectPtr > parameter. This is because virtualization drivers directly > reference this API in their virDriverPtr tables, tieing its > API design to the public vir

[libvirt] [PATCH 04/11] Separate virGetHostname() API contract from driver APIs

2013-05-02 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
From: "Daniel P. Berrange" Currently the virGetHostname() API has a bogus virConnectPtr parameter. This is because virtualization drivers directly reference this API in their virDriverPtr tables, tieing its API design to the public virConnectGetHostname API design. This also causes problems for