Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 08/10] Support passing QEMU lock state to dest during migration

2011-05-27 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 05:12:38PM +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 07:24:23AM -0400, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > Some lock managers associate state with leases, allowing a process > > to temporarily release its leases, and re-acquire them later, safe > > in the knowledge t

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 08/10] Support passing QEMU lock state to dest during migration

2011-05-27 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 07:24:23AM -0400, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > Some lock managers associate state with leases, allowing a process > to temporarily release its leases, and re-acquire them later, safe > in the knowledge that no other process has acquired + released the > leases in between. >

[libvirt] [PATCH 08/10] Support passing QEMU lock state to dest during migration

2011-05-24 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
Some lock managers associate state with leases, allowing a process to temporarily release its leases, and re-acquire them later, safe in the knowledge that no other process has acquired + released the leases in between. This is already used between suspend/resume operations, and must also be used

[libvirt] [PATCH 08/10] Support passing QEMU lock state to dest during migration

2011-05-19 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
Some lock managers associate state with leases, allowing a process to temporarily release its leases, and re-acquire them later, safe in the knowledge that no other process has acquired + released the leases in between. This is already used between suspend/resume operations, and must also be used