On Fri, 2017-12-15 at 14:20 +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > > You know that generally we prefer variables declared at the top scope?
> >
> > Is that so? I've seen several instances of the opposite, and it
> > makes to me not to pollute the function scope with one-use
> > variables when there are us
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 14:11:41 +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-12-15 at 13:18 +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 17:29:50 +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > > While at the moment we're only performing a single check that is
> > > connected to vCPU hotplugging, we
On Fri, 2017-12-15 at 13:18 +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 17:29:50 +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > While at the moment we're only performing a single check that is
> > connected to vCPU hotplugging, we're going to introduce a second
> > one soon. Move the topology check un
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 17:29:50 +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> While at the moment we're only performing a single check that is
> connected to vCPU hotplugging, we're going to introduce a second
> one soon. Move the topology check underneath the capability check
> to make that easier; as a bonus
While at the moment we're only performing a single check that is
connected to vCPU hotplugging, we're going to introduce a second
one soon. Move the topology check underneath the capability check
to make that easier; as a bonus, doing so allows us to reduce the
scope of the 'topologycpus' variable.