On 08/28/2013 11:39 AM, Laine Stump wrote:
> This better fits the modern naming scheme in libvirt, and anticipates
> an upcoming change where a single instance of this state will be
> maintained by a separate state driver, and every instance of the netcf
> driver will share the same state.
> ---
>
This better fits the modern naming scheme in libvirt, and anticipates
an upcoming change where a single instance of this state will be
maintained by a separate state driver, and every instance of the netcf
driver will share the same state.
---
src/interface/interface_backend_netcf.c | 52 +