On 08/25/2017 02:30 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 04:47:03PM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 08/23/2017 07:47 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
>>> We always truncated the name at 20 bytes instead of characters. In
>>> case 20 bytes were in the middle of a multi-byte ch
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 08:30:52AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 04:47:03PM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
On 08/23/2017 07:47 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
We always truncated the name at 20 bytes instead of characters. In
case 20 bytes were in the middle of a multi-byte
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 04:47:03PM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
On 08/23/2017 07:47 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
We always truncated the name at 20 bytes instead of characters. In
case 20 bytes were in the middle of a multi-byte character, then the
string became invalid and various parts of the
On 08/23/2017 07:47 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> We always truncated the name at 20 bytes instead of characters. In
> case 20 bytes were in the middle of a multi-byte character, then the
> string became invalid and various parts of the code would error
> out (e.g. XML parsing of that string).
We always truncated the name at 20 bytes instead of characters. In
case 20 bytes were in the middle of a multi-byte character, then the
string became invalid and various parts of the code would error
out (e.g. XML parsing of that string). Let's instead properly
truncate it after 20 characters ins
