On 07/25/2013 12:11 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>>
>>> +/*
>>> + * Returns 0 on success, -1 on fatal error, -2 on no valid cgroup
>>> + */
>>> +int virCgroupNewDetectMachine(const char *name,
>>> +
>>> +if (!virCgroupIsValidMachineGroup(*group, name, drivername)) {
>>> +virCgroup
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:37:12AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 07/25/2013 06:20 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > From: "Daniel P. Berrange"
> >
> > Instead of requiring drivers to use a combination of calls
> > to virCgroupNewDetect and virCgroupIsValidMachine, combine
> > the two into virCgro
On 07/25/2013 06:20 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> From: "Daniel P. Berrange"
>
> Instead of requiring drivers to use a combination of calls
> to virCgroupNewDetect and virCgroupIsValidMachine, combine
> the two into virCgroupNewDetectMachine
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange
> ---
> src/
From: "Daniel P. Berrange"
Instead of requiring drivers to use a combination of calls
to virCgroupNewDetect and virCgroupIsValidMachine, combine
the two into virCgroupNewDetectMachine
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange
---
src/libvirt_private.syms | 1 +
src/lxc/lxc_process.c| 20 -
