Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 11/13] Add support for an explicit watchdog event

2010-03-22 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 04:43:25PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 05:37:02PM +0100, Daniel Veillard wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 03:38:59PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > > +typedef enum { > > > +VIR_DOMAIN_EVENT_WATCHDOG_NONE = 0, > > > +VIR_DOMAIN_E

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 11/13] Add support for an explicit watchdog event

2010-03-22 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 05:37:02PM +0100, Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 03:38:59PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > This introduces a new event type > > > >VIR_DOMAIN_EVENT_ID_WATCHDOG > > > > This event includes the action that is about to be taken > > as a result of t

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 11/13] Add support for an explicit watchdog event

2010-03-22 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 03:38:59PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > This introduces a new event type > >VIR_DOMAIN_EVENT_ID_WATCHDOG > > This event includes the action that is about to be taken > as a result of the watchdog triggering > > typedef enum { > VIR_DOMAIN_EVENT_WATCHDOG_NO

[libvirt] [PATCH 11/13] Add support for an explicit watchdog event

2010-03-19 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
This introduces a new event type VIR_DOMAIN_EVENT_ID_WATCHDOG This event includes the action that is about to be taken as a result of the watchdog triggering typedef enum { VIR_DOMAIN_EVENT_WATCHDOG_NONE = 0, VIR_DOMAIN_EVENT_WATCHDOG_PAUSE, VIR_DOMAIN_EVENT_WATCHDOG_RESET,