On 10/06/2010 06:18 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
Xen is more complex than I first thought.
I'm debating whether to support xendConfigVersion <= 2 (xm_internal.h)
or just xendConfigVersion >= 3 (xend_internal.h).
RHEL 5.5 uses xendConfigVersion==2, so that answers the question
(although not in the wa
On 09/29/2010 06:09 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
Here's where I ran out of time for the day. I'm much less familiar
with xen than with qemu, so I have no idea how to tell if xen's
documented domain/vcpu_avail (which is what we want for current vcpus)
is usable in contrast to domain/vcpus (the maximum a
On 10/01/2010 04:18 PM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
I would think augmenting the sexpr should be sufficient for this
but the problem is really to find out when the feature is available,
and I don't know how to do this reliably either (except trying and if
there is an identifiable error keep it disa
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 06:09:22PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> Here's where I ran out of time for the day. I'm much less familiar
> with xen than with qemu, so I have no idea how to tell if xen's
> documented domain/vcpu_avail (which is what we want for current vcpus)
> is usable in contrast to dom
Here's where I ran out of time for the day. I'm much less familiar
with xen than with qemu, so I have no idea how to tell if xen's
documented domain/vcpu_avail (which is what we want for current vcpus)
is usable in contrast to domain/vcpus (the maximum amount). For that
matter, I'm not even sure
