On 06/24/2016 03:35 PM, Laine Stump wrote:
On 06/23/2016 06:14 PM, John Ferlan wrote:
On 06/22/2016 01:37 PM, Laine Stump wrote:
When support for was added in commit
9a4b705f back in 2010, it erroneously looked at
for a user-specified guest-side interface name. This was never
documented thou
On 06/23/2016 06:14 PM, John Ferlan wrote:
On 06/22/2016 01:37 PM, Laine Stump wrote:
When support for was added in commit
9a4b705f back in 2010, it erroneously looked at
for a user-specified guest-side interface name. This was never
documented though. (that attribute already existed at the t
On 06/22/2016 01:37 PM, Laine Stump wrote:
> When support for was added in commit
> 9a4b705f back in 2010, it erroneously looked at
> for a user-specified guest-side interface name. This was never
> documented though. (that attribute already existed at the time in the
> data.ethernet union memb
When support for was added in commit
9a4b705f back in 2010, it erroneously looked at
for a user-specified guest-side interface name. This was never
documented though. (that attribute already existed at the time in the
data.ethernet union member of virDomainNetDef, but apparently had no
practical
