On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 02:29:06PM +0100, Jiri Denemark wrote:
The family/model numbers are nice for humans or for comparing with
/proc/cpuinfo, but sometimes there's a need to see the CPUID
representation of the signature. Let's add it into a comment for each
signature in out cpu_map XMLs as the
The family/model numbers are nice for humans or for comparing with
/proc/cpuinfo, but sometimes there's a need to see the CPUID
representation of the signature. Let's add it into a comment for each
signature in out cpu_map XMLs as the conversion is not exactly
straightforward.
Signed-off-by: Jiri
