On 3/25/19 12:19 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 01:07:04PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
>> [keeping context, because of adding Dan in cc]
>>> To some degree we could be 'stuck with' the model for snapshots, but
>>> that doesn't mean checkpoints couldn't make use of some newer
>
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 01:07:04PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> [keeping context, because of adding Dan in cc]
> > To some degree we could be 'stuck with' the model for snapshots, but
> > that doesn't mean checkpoints couldn't make use of some newer
> > functionality that stores everything in one fil
[keeping context, because of adding Dan in cc]
On 3/22/19 9:35 AM, John Ferlan wrote:
>
>
> On 3/20/19 5:32 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> Rather than one file per snapshot, store all qemu snapshots in a
>> single file, using the recently added bulk snapshot list
>> operations. For now, this doesn't c
On 3/20/19 5:32 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> Rather than one file per snapshot, store all qemu snapshots in a
> single file, using the recently added bulk snapshot list
> operations. For now, this doesn't change how often libvirt writes a
> snapshot file, but it does open the door for the next patch
Rather than one file per snapshot, store all qemu snapshots in a
single file, using the recently added bulk snapshot list
operations. For now, this doesn't change how often libvirt writes a
snapshot file, but it does open the door for the next patch to update
the signature to qemuDomainSnapshotWrit
