On 04/23/14 18:18, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 04/20/2014 04:13 PM, Peter Krempa wrote:
>> To avoid having the root of a backing chain present twice in the list we
>> need to invert the working of virStorageFileGetMetadataRecurse.
>>
>
>> /* Recursive workhorse for virStorageFileGetMetadata. */
>> s
On 04/20/2014 04:13 PM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> To avoid having the root of a backing chain present twice in the list we
> need to invert the working of virStorageFileGetMetadataRecurse.
>
> /* Recursive workhorse for virStorageFileGetMetadata. */
> static int
> -virStorageFileGetMetadataRecurse
On 04/20/2014 04:13 PM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> To avoid having the root of a backing chain present twice in the list we
> need to invert the working of virStorageFileGetMetadataRecurse.
>
> Until now the recursive worker created a new backing chain element from
> the name and other information pass
To avoid having the root of a backing chain present twice in the list we
need to invert the working of virStorageFileGetMetadataRecurse.
Until now the recursive worker created a new backing chain element from
the name and other information passed as arguments. This required us to
pass the data of