On 06/27/2013 12:11 PM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 27.06.2013 11:56, Ján Tomko wrote:
>> On 06/27/2013 09:54 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>>> On 21.06.2013 19:30, Ján Tomko wrote:
If networkUnplugBandwidth is called on a network which has
no bandwidth defined, print a warning instead of
On 27.06.2013 11:56, Ján Tomko wrote:
> On 06/27/2013 09:54 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>> On 21.06.2013 19:30, Ján Tomko wrote:
>>> If networkUnplugBandwidth is called on a network which has
>>> no bandwidth defined, print a warning instead of crashing.
>>>
>>> This can happen when destroying a do
On 06/27/2013 09:54 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 21.06.2013 19:30, Ján Tomko wrote:
>> If networkUnplugBandwidth is called on a network which has
>> no bandwidth defined, print a warning instead of crashing.
>>
>> This can happen when destroying a domain with bandwith if
>> bandwidth was remove
On 21.06.2013 19:30, Ján Tomko wrote:
> If networkUnplugBandwidth is called on a network which has
> no bandwidth defined, print a warning instead of crashing.
>
> This can happen when destroying a domain with bandwith if
> bandwidth was removed from the network after the domain was
> started.
>
On 06/21/2013 09:23 PM, John Ferlan wrote:
> On 06/21/2013 01:30 PM, Ján Tomko wrote:
>> If networkUnplugBandwidth is called on a network which has
>> no bandwidth defined, print a warning instead of crashing.
>>
>> This can happen when destroying a domain with bandwith if
>
> s/bandwith/bandwidth
On 06/21/2013 01:30 PM, Ján Tomko wrote:
> If networkUnplugBandwidth is called on a network which has
> no bandwidth defined, print a warning instead of crashing.
>
> This can happen when destroying a domain with bandwith if
s/bandwith/bandwidth
> bandwidth was removed from the network after the
If networkUnplugBandwidth is called on a network which has
no bandwidth defined, print a warning instead of crashing.
This can happen when destroying a domain with bandwith if
bandwidth was removed from the network after the domain was
started.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975359
-