On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 08:51:17AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 02/13/2012 08:35 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >On 02/13/2012 03:15 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >>
> >>It should be noted that virtio-scsi has not been merged either in the
> >>Linux kernel or in QEMU yet.
> >>
> >>In particular, t
On 02/13/2012 08:35 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 02/13/2012 03:15 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
It should be noted that virtio-scsi has not been merged either in the
Linux kernel or in QEMU yet.
In particular, this patch assumes that we'll introduce a 'virtio-scsi'
alias which I'm planning on obje
On 02/13/2012 03:15 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
It should be noted that virtio-scsi has not been merged either in the
Linux kernel or in QEMU yet.
In particular, this patch assumes that we'll introduce a 'virtio-scsi'
alias which I'm planning on objecting strongly too :-)
This patch was taken i
On 01/13/2012 06:23 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Adding a new model for virtio-scsi roughly follows the same scheme
as the previous patch.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
It should be noted that virtio-scsi has not been merged either in the Linux
kernel or in QEMU yet.
In particular, this patch as
On 01/13/2012 05:23 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Adding a new model for virtio-scsi roughly follows the same scheme
> as the previous patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
> ---
> This is the bare minimum necessary to use virtio-scsi.
> I'll gladly leave everything else, including sup
Adding a new model for virtio-scsi roughly follows the same scheme
as the previous patch.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
---
This is the bare minimum necessary to use virtio-scsi.
I'll gladly leave everything else, including support for
full SCSI addresses (target/LUN) to Os
