Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 2/2] qemu_firmware: Try to autofill for old style UEFI specification

2020-01-06 Thread Michal Privoznik
On 12/18/19 11:50 PM, Cole Robinson wrote: On 12/17/19 12:25 PM, Michal Privoznik wrote: While we discourage people to use the old style of specifying UEFI for their domains (the old style is putting path to the FW image under /domain/os/loader/ whilst the new one is using /domain/os/@firmware),

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 2/2] qemu_firmware: Try to autofill for old style UEFI specification

2019-12-18 Thread Cole Robinson
On 12/17/19 12:25 PM, Michal Privoznik wrote: > While we discourage people to use the old style of specifying > UEFI for their domains (the old style is putting path to the FW > image under /domain/os/loader/ whilst the new one is using > /domain/os/@firmware), some applications might have not adop

[libvirt] [PATCH 2/2] qemu_firmware: Try to autofill for old style UEFI specification

2019-12-17 Thread Michal Privoznik
While we discourage people to use the old style of specifying UEFI for their domains (the old style is putting path to the FW image under /domain/os/loader/ whilst the new one is using /domain/os/@firmware), some applications might have not adopted yet. They still rely on libvirt autofilling NVRAM