Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 2/5] s390: Report blank host model instead of "host"

2016-11-04 Thread Jiri Denemark
On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 11:00:29 -0400, Jason J. Herne wrote: > On 11/03/2016 08:54 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 16:34:32 -0400, Jason J. Herne wrote: > >> From: "Collin L. Walling" > >> > >> On s390 , the host's features are heavily influenced by not only the host > >> har

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 2/5] s390: Report blank host model instead of "host"

2016-11-04 Thread Jason J. Herne
On 11/03/2016 08:54 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote: On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 16:34:32 -0400, Jason J. Herne wrote: From: "Collin L. Walling" On s390 , the host's features are heavily influenced by not only the host hardware but also by hardware microcode level, host OS version, qemu version and kvm ve

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 2/5] s390: Report blank host model instead of "host"

2016-11-03 Thread Jiri Denemark
On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 16:34:32 -0400, Jason J. Herne wrote: > From: "Collin L. Walling" > > On s390 , the host's features are heavily influenced by not only the host > hardware but also by hardware microcode level, host OS version, qemu > version and kvm version. In this environment it does not

[libvirt] [PATCH 2/5] s390: Report blank host model instead of "host"

2016-11-02 Thread Jason J. Herne
From: "Collin L. Walling" On s390 , the host's features are heavily influenced by not only the host hardware but also by hardware microcode level, host OS version, qemu version and kvm version. In this environment it does not make sense to attempt to report exact host details. Rather than use the