bhu (roprabhu); Gerhard
> Stenzel; Jens Osterkamp; Anthony Liguori
> Subject: RE: [libvirt] [PATCH 3/6] Introduce yet another migration
> version in API.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Stefan Berger [mailto:stef...@linux.vnet.ibm.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, Apri
On 04/21/2011 10:24 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 09:33:42AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
On 04/21/2011 07:43 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 07:37:30AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
and simply doesn't start the VM. After this function is called all
s
ng (dwang2); Roopa
> Prabhu (roprabhu); Gerhard Stenzel; Jens Osterkamp; Anthony Liguori
> Subject: Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 3/6] Introduce yet another migration
> version in API.
>
> On 04/21/2011 07:43 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 07:37:30AM -0400, St
David Wang (dwang2); Roopa
> Prabhu (roprabhu)
> Subject: Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 3/6] Introduce yet another migration
> version in API.
>
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 04:28:12PM -0500, Christian Benvenuti (benve)
> wrote:
> > Daniel,
> > I looked at the patch-set you sent
2); Roopa
> Prabhu (roprabhu); Gerhard Stenzel; Jens Osterkamp; Anthony Liguori
> Subject: Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 3/6] Introduce yet another migration
> version in API.
>
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 07:37:30AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > On 04/20/2011 11:38 PM, Christian Benve
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 09:33:42AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 04/21/2011 07:43 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 07:37:30AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> >>
> >>and simply doesn't start the VM. After this function is called all
> >>sockets are closed and the communicati
On 04/21/2011 07:43 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 07:37:30AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
and simply doesn't start the VM. After this function is called all
sockets are closed and the communication with the source host is
cut. I don't think it allows for fall-back at this
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 04:28:12PM -0500, Christian Benvenuti (benve) wrote:
> Daniel,
> I looked at the patch-set you sent out on the 2/9/11
>
> [libvirt] [PATCH 0/6] Introduce a new migration protocol
> to QEMU driver
> http://www.mail-archive.com/libvir-list@redhat
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 10:38:40PM -0500, Christian Benvenuti (benve) wrote:
> > On 04/20/2011 05:28 PM, Christian Benvenuti (benve) wrote:
> > > Daniel,
> > >I looked at the patch-set you sent out on the 2/9/11
> > >
> > >[libvirt] [PATCH 0/6] Introduce a new migration protocol
> > >
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 07:37:30AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 04/20/2011 11:38 PM, Christian Benvenuti (benve) wrote:
> >>On 04/20/2011 05:28 PM, Christian Benvenuti (benve) wrote:
> >>>Daniel,
> >>>I looked at the patch-set you sent out on the 2/9/11
> >>>
> >>>[libvirt] [PATCH 0/6]
On 04/20/2011 11:38 PM, Christian Benvenuti (benve) wrote:
On 04/20/2011 05:28 PM, Christian Benvenuti (benve) wrote:
Daniel,
I looked at the patch-set you sent out on the 2/9/11
[libvirt] [PATCH 0/6] Introduce a new migration protocol
to QEMU driver
http:/
> I assume that 2 associations with the same profile are possible with
> 802.1Qbg and Qbh.
According to the IEEE standard, it is possible to have a transient
period during which you have two associations and therefore
standard-compliant implementations are supposed to be able to handle
it.
/Chris
> On 04/20/2011 05:28 PM, Christian Benvenuti (benve) wrote:
> > Daniel,
> >I looked at the patch-set you sent out on the 2/9/11
> >
> >[libvirt] [PATCH 0/6] Introduce a new migration protocol
> > to QEMU driver
> >http://www.mail-archive.com/libvir-list@redhat.
On 04/20/2011 05:28 PM, Christian Benvenuti (benve) wrote:
Daniel,
I looked at the patch-set you sent out on the 2/9/11
[libvirt] [PATCH 0/6] Introduce a new migration protocol
to QEMU driver
http://www.mail-archive.com/libvir-list@redhat.com/msg33223.html
What
heir own deinit functions.
Thanks
/Chris
> -Original Message-
> From: libvir-list-boun...@redhat.com [mailto:libvir-list-
> boun...@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Eric Blake
> Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2011 4:12 PM
> To: Daniel P. Berrange
> Cc: libvir-list@redhat.com
> Subj
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 05:12:18PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 02/09/2011 09:58 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > This patch attempts to introduce a version 3 that uses the
> > improved 5 step sequence
> >
> > * Src: Begin
> > - Generate XML to pass to dst
> > - Generate op
On 02/09/2011 09:58 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> This patch attempts to introduce a version 3 that uses the
> improved 5 step sequence
>
> * Src: Begin
> - Generate XML to pass to dst
> - Generate optional cookie to pass to dst
>
> * Dst: Prepare
> - Get ready
On 02/09/2011 09:58 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> This patch attempts to introduce a version 3 that uses the
> improved 5 step sequence
>
> * Src: Begin
> - Generate XML to pass to dst
> - Generate optional cookie to pass to dst
>
> * Dst: Prepare
> - Get ready
Migration just seems togo from bad to worse. We already had to
introduce a second migration protocol when adding the QEMU driver,
since the one from Xen was insufficiently flexible to cope with
passing the data the QEMU driver required.
It turns out that this protocol still has some flaws that we
19 matches
Mail list logo
