On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 13:54:54 -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
> On 10/13/2015 12:29 PM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 11:47:10 -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
...
> >> @@ -2341,15 +2343,49 @@ virDomainIOThreadIDDefArrayInit(virDomainDefPtr
> >> def)
> >> if (def->iothreads == def->
On 10/13/2015 12:29 PM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 11:47:10 -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264008
>>
>> The existing algorithm assumed that someone was making small, incremental
>> changes; however, it is possible to change iothreads f
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 11:47:10 -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264008
>
> The existing algorithm assumed that someone was making small, incremental
> changes; however, it is possible to change iothreads from 0 (or relatively
> small number) to some really
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264008
The existing algorithm assumed that someone was making small, incremental
changes; however, it is possible to change iothreads from 0 (or relatively
small number) to some really large number and the algorithm would possibly
spin its wheels doing
