On 04/04/14 14:54, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 04/04/2014 03:31 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
>
>>> struct _virStorageFileMetadata {
>>> -char *backingStore; /* Canonical name (absolute file, or protocol) */
>>> -char *backingStoreRaw; /* If file, original name, possibly relative */
>>> -char *d
On 04/04/2014 03:31 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
>> struct _virStorageFileMetadata {
>> -char *backingStore; /* Canonical name (absolute file, or protocol) */
>> -char *backingStoreRaw; /* If file, original name, possibly relative */
>> -char *directory; /* The directory containing basenam
On 04/04/14 06:32, Eric Blake wrote:
> The current use of virStorageFileMetadata is awkward; to learn
> some of the information about a child node, you have to read
> fields in the parent node. This does not lend itself well to
> modifying backing chains (whether inserting a new node in the
> chai
The current use of virStorageFileMetadata is awkward; to learn
some of the information about a child node, you have to read
fields in the parent node. This does not lend itself well to
modifying backing chains (whether inserting a new node in the
chain, or consolidating existing nodes); better wou
