On 09/04/2013 06:13 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 29.08.2013 00:38, Eric Blake wrote:
>> While debugging a failure of 'virsh qemu-attach', I noticed that
>> we were leaking the count of active domains on failure. This
>> means that a libvirtd session that is supposed to quit after
>> active dom
On 29.08.2013 00:38, Eric Blake wrote:
> While debugging a failure of 'virsh qemu-attach', I noticed that
> we were leaking the count of active domains on failure. This
> means that a libvirtd session that is supposed to quit after
> active domains disappear will hang around forever.
>
> * src/qe
While debugging a failure of 'virsh qemu-attach', I noticed that
we were leaking the count of active domains on failure. This
means that a libvirtd session that is supposed to quit after
active domains disappear will hang around forever.
* src/qemu/qemu_process.c (qemuProcessAttach): Undo count o