Re: [libvirt] [PATCH RFC] libxl: fix paths in capability string

2015-01-07 Thread Wei Liu
Jim, another idea: if those strings are likely to be wrong and in fact not used, can we just not print them? Wei. -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH RFC] libxl: fix paths in capability string

2015-01-06 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 10:28:13AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote: > On 01/06/2015 09:12 AM, Wei Liu wrote: > > Currently libxl driver hardcodes some paths in its capability string, > > which might not be the correct paths. > > > > This patch introduces --with-libxl-prefix, so that user can specify the >

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH RFC] libxl: fix paths in capability string

2015-01-06 Thread Eric Blake
On 01/06/2015 09:12 AM, Wei Liu wrote: > Currently libxl driver hardcodes some paths in its capability string, > which might not be the correct paths. > > This patch introduces --with-libxl-prefix, so that user can specify the > prefix used to build Xen tools. The default value is /usr/local which

[libvirt] [PATCH RFC] libxl: fix paths in capability string

2015-01-06 Thread Wei Liu
Currently libxl driver hardcodes some paths in its capability string, which might not be the correct paths. This patch introduces --with-libxl-prefix, so that user can specify the prefix used to build Xen tools. The default value is /usr/local which is the default --prefix for Xen tools. Change e