On 08/29/2018 11:11 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1621910
>
> When introducing this check back in 4ad54a417a1 my mindset was
> that if an element is missing in update XML then user is
> requesting for removal of the corresponding setting. For
> instan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1621910
When introducing this check back in 4ad54a417a1 my mindset was
that if an element is missing in update XML then user is
requesting for removal of the corresponding setting. For
instance, if is not present in update XML any QoS
previously set on
