On 14/10/16 16:15, John Ferlan wrote:
[...]
I have written this lines as a part of GPLv2+ boilerplate:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2016-August/msg01160.html,
which I took from
other libvirt parts. And I guess it was naturally to change name and
company, don't you?
And again, if
[...]
>>
>> I have written this lines as a part of GPLv2+ boilerplate:
>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2016-August/msg01160.html,
>> which I took from
>> other libvirt parts. And I guess it was naturally to change name and
>> company, don't you?
>> And again, if you insist I can le
07-Oct-16 20:09, Olga Krishtal пишет:
On 24/09/16 00:12, John Ferlan wrote:
On 09/23/2016 11:56 AM, Olga Krishtal wrote:
On 21/09/16 19:17, Maxim Nestratov wrote:
20 сент. 2016 г., в 23:52, John Ferlan написал(а):
On 09/15/2016 03:32 AM, Olga Krishtal wrote:
Hi everyone, we would like to
On 24/09/16 00:12, John Ferlan wrote:
On 09/23/2016 11:56 AM, Olga Krishtal wrote:
On 21/09/16 19:17, Maxim Nestratov wrote:
20 сент. 2016 г., в 23:52, John Ferlan написал(а):
On 09/15/2016 03:32 AM, Olga Krishtal wrote:
Hi everyone, we would like to propose the first implementation of fs
23-Sep-16 23:51, John Ferlan пишет:
[snip]
I think rather than just copy what the storage pool does, I would think
the new driver could "build up" what it needs based on some consensus
based on what makes sense for the usage model.
Having a guest mount a host file system would seem to be poss
On 09/23/2016 11:56 AM, Olga Krishtal wrote:
> On 21/09/16 19:17, Maxim Nestratov wrote:
>>> 20 сент. 2016 г., в 23:52, John Ferlan написал(а):
>>>
>>>
>>>
On 09/15/2016 03:32 AM, Olga Krishtal wrote:
Hi everyone, we would like to propose the first implementation of fspool
with di
On 09/23/2016 11:45 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 11:38:10AM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 09/21/2016 12:17 PM, Maxim Nestratov wrote:
>>>
20 сент. 2016 г., в 23:52, John Ferlan написал(а):
> On 09/15/2016 03:32 AM, Olga Krishtal wrote:
>
On 21/09/16 19:17, Maxim Nestratov wrote:
20 сент. 2016 г., в 23:52, John Ferlan написал(а):
On 09/15/2016 03:32 AM, Olga Krishtal wrote:
Hi everyone, we would like to propose the first implementation of fspool
with directory backend.
Filesystem pools is a facility to manage filesystems res
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 11:38:10AM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
>
>
> On 09/21/2016 12:17 PM, Maxim Nestratov wrote:
> >
> >> 20 сент. 2016 г., в 23:52, John Ferlan написал(а):
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> On 09/15/2016 03:32 AM, Olga Krishtal wrote:
> >>> Hi everyone, we would like to propose the first i
On 09/21/2016 12:17 PM, Maxim Nestratov wrote:
>
>> 20 сент. 2016 г., в 23:52, John Ferlan написал(а):
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 09/15/2016 03:32 AM, Olga Krishtal wrote:
>>> Hi everyone, we would like to propose the first implementation of fspool
>>> with directory backend.
>>>
>>> Filesystem pools is a
> 20 сент. 2016 г., в 23:52, John Ferlan написал(а):
>
>
>
>> On 09/15/2016 03:32 AM, Olga Krishtal wrote:
>> Hi everyone, we would like to propose the first implementation of fspool
>> with directory backend.
>>
>> Filesystem pools is a facility to manage filesystems resources similar
>> to
On 09/15/2016 03:32 AM, Olga Krishtal wrote:
> Hi everyone, we would like to propose the first implementation of fspool
> with directory backend.
>
> Filesystem pools is a facility to manage filesystems resources similar
> to how storage pools manages volume resources. Furthermore new API follow
Hi everyone, we would like to propose the first implementation of fspool
with directory backend.
Filesystem pools is a facility to manage filesystems resources similar
to how storage pools manages volume resources. Furthermore new API follows
storage API closely where it makes sense. Uploading/dow
13 matches
Mail list logo
