On 12/03/2012 10:55 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 30.11.2012 18:53, Laine Stump wrote:
>> As I'm looking at all these uses of id's, I'm wondering if there's
>> any danger of namespace conflict with other users of tc. (This isn't
>> any critique, just curiousity).
> No, class ID is specific with
On 30.11.2012 18:53, Laine Stump wrote:
> On 11/19/2012 11:51 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>> These set bridge part of QoS when bringing domain's interface up.
>> Long story short, if there's a 'floor' set, a new QoS class is created.
>> ClassID MUST be unique within the bridge and should be kept fo
On 11/19/2012 11:51 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> These set bridge part of QoS when bringing domain's interface up.
> Long story short, if there's a 'floor' set, a new QoS class is created.
> ClassID MUST be unique within the bridge and should be kept for
> unplug phase.
> ---
> po/POTFILES.in
These set bridge part of QoS when bringing domain's interface up.
Long story short, if there's a 'floor' set, a new QoS class is created.
ClassID MUST be unique within the bridge and should be kept for
unplug phase.
---
po/POTFILES.in|1 +
src/util/virnetdevbandwidth.c | 178 +
