On 05/24/2017 09:30 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 05:12:06PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>> On 05/24/2017 04:58 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 04:16:45PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 05/24/2017 02:47 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 05:12:06PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 05/24/2017 04:58 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 04:16:45PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 05/24/2017 02:47 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:49:58PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wr
On 05/24/2017 04:58 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 04:16:45PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>> On 05/24/2017 02:47 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:49:58PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
That's quite exact. I mean the word 'guessing'. W
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 04:16:45PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 05/24/2017 02:47 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:49:58PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> >> That's quite exact. I mean the word 'guessing'. We can't really provide
> >> reliable way of dealing
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 04:09:35PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 05/24/2017 02:42 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 05:07:40PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
Because:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2017-May/msg00088.html
I don't think this is a reason at
On 05/24/2017 02:47 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:49:58PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>> That's quite exact. I mean the word 'guessing'. We can't really provide
>> reliable way of dealing with what you're suggesting (unless we cut the
>> limit really small) nor we
On 05/24/2017 02:42 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 05:07:40PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>> Because:
>>
>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2017-May/msg00088.html
>
> I don't think this is a reason at all.
>
> Libguestfs uses an RPC system which was modelle
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 01:42:44PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 05:07:40PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
Because:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2017-May/msg00088.html
I don't think this is a reason at all.
Libguestfs uses an RPC system which was mod
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:49:58PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> That's quite exact. I mean the word 'guessing'. We can't really provide
> reliable way of dealing with what you're suggesting (unless we cut the
> limit really small) nor we can guarantee atomicity. Therefore I think it
> would be
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 05:07:40PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> Because:
>
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2017-May/msg00088.html
I don't think this is a reason at all.
Libguestfs uses an RPC system which was modelled on the libvirt one,
and has exactly the same problem with me
On 05/24/2017 12:55 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
>
>
> No, this has nothing to do with RPC. Let me "pseudocode" this:
>
>
> int
> virConnectGetAllDomainStats(virConnectPtr conn,
>...,
>unsigned int flags)
> {
>bool legacy = flags & VI
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:54:26PM +0200, Peter Krempa wrote:
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:49:58 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 05/24/2017 12:32 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 05:29:52PM +0200, Peter Krempa wrote:
>> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 17:19:53 +0200, Martin Kletzan
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 05:29:28PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 05/23/2017 05:19 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 05:07:40PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 05/23/2017 04:35 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 04:23:30PM +0200, Peter Krempa wrote:
H
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:49:58 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 05/24/2017 12:32 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 05:29:52PM +0200, Peter Krempa wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 17:19:53 +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> >>> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 05:07:40PM +0200,
On 05/24/2017 12:32 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 05:29:52PM +0200, Peter Krempa wrote:
>> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 17:19:53 +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 05:07:40PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>>> > On 05/23/2017 04:35 PM, Martin Kletzander
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:32:05 +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 05:29:52PM +0200, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 17:19:53 +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 05:07:40PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> > > > On 05/23/2017 04:35 P
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 05:29:52PM +0200, Peter Krempa wrote:
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 17:19:53 +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 05:07:40PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 05/23/2017 04:35 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 04:23:30PM +0200, Peter
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 17:19:53 +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 05:07:40PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> > On 05/23/2017 04:35 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 04:23:30PM +0200, Peter Krempa wrote:
[...]
> > > > + * Note that this API is pro
On 05/23/2017 05:19 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 05:07:40PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>> On 05/23/2017 04:35 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 04:23:30PM +0200, Peter Krempa wrote:
Hint that the users should limit the number of VMs queried
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 05:07:40PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 05/23/2017 04:35 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 04:23:30PM +0200, Peter Krempa wrote:
Hint that the users should limit the number of VMs queried in the bulk
stats API.
---
v2:
- added a suggestion of the
On 05/23/2017 04:35 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 04:23:30PM +0200, Peter Krempa wrote:
>> Hint that the users should limit the number of VMs queried in the bulk
>> stats API.
>> ---
>> v2:
>> - added a suggestion of the number of queried VMs (valid after bump to
>> 32M mes
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 04:23:30PM +0200, Peter Krempa wrote:
Hint that the users should limit the number of VMs queried in the bulk
stats API.
---
v2:
- added a suggestion of the number of queried VMs (valid after bump to 32M
message)
src/libvirt-domain.c | 8
1 file changed, 8 inserti
Hint that the users should limit the number of VMs queried in the bulk
stats API.
---
v2:
- added a suggestion of the number of queried VMs (valid after bump to 32M
message)
src/libvirt-domain.c | 8
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/libvirt-domain.c b/src/libvirt-domain
23 matches
Mail list logo
