Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v2] macvtap: convert send / recv function to use libnl

2010-11-15 Thread Stefan Berger
On 11/15/2010 01:36 PM, Eric Blake wrote: On 11/12/2010 05:34 AM, Stefan Berger wrote: -V2: - adapting patch due to changes in the same file by another patch In a second step I am converting the netlink send/receive functions to use libnl. I didn't see this one applied yet. It looks clean

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v2] macvtap: convert send / recv function to use libnl

2010-11-15 Thread Eric Blake
On 11/12/2010 05:34 AM, Stefan Berger wrote: > -V2: > - adapting patch due to changes in the same file by another patch > > In a second step I am converting the netlink send/receive functions to > use libnl. I didn't see this one applied yet. It looks clean to me; ACK. -- Eric Blake ebl..

[libvirt] [PATCH v2] macvtap: convert send / recv function to use libnl

2010-11-12 Thread Stefan Berger
V2: - rebasing the patch following changes to the same file by another patch In a second step I am converting the netlink send/receive functions to use libnl. I tested this with 802.1Qbg profiles and my test server and did not see a regression. Caveat: The online documentation of libnl talks

[libvirt] [PATCH v2] macvtap: convert send / recv function to use libnl

2010-11-12 Thread Stefan Berger
-V2: - adapting patch due to changes in the same file by another patch In a second step I am converting the netlink send/receive functions to use libnl. I tested this with 802.1Qbg profiles and my test server and did not see a regression. Caveat: The online documentation of libnl talks about